Get 40% Off
🚨 Volatile Markets? Find Hidden Gems for Serious Outperformance
Find Stocks Now

US State Dept expects to finalize AUKUS trade exemptions in next 120 days

Published 04/19/2024, 04:07 PM
Updated 04/19/2024, 10:40 PM
© Reuters. FILE PHOTO: U.S. President Joe Biden, Australian Prime Minister Anthony Albanese and British Prime Minister Rishi Sunak deliver remarks on the Australia - United Kingdom - U.S. (AUKUS) partnership, after a trilateral meeting, at Naval Base Point Loma in S

By David Brunnstrom

WASHINGTON (Reuters) -The U.S. State Department said on Friday it expects to finalize trade exemptions for the AUKUS defense project with Australia and Britain in the next 120 days, signaling a further delay in but offering the prospect of a positive outcome in the project to counter China.

AUKUS, formed in 2021 to address shared worries about China's growing power, would involve Australia acquiring nuclear-powered attack submarines, among other items of defense cooperation. But the sharing of closely guarded technology is governed by strict U.S. International Trafficking in Arms Regulations (ITAR).

The 2024 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) requires President Joe Biden to determine within 120 days of his signing it into law on Dec. 22 whether Australia and Britain have export control regimes "comparable to the United States" and thereby qualify for exemptions to the ITAR regulations. The 120 days is reached on Saturday.

"Exemptions in our export control systems, within a framework of shared standards with Australia and the UK, are key to harnessing and maximizing the innovative power residing in our defense industrial bases," the State Department said.

"We fully expect to finalize the new trade exemptions – based on stakeholder input – over the course of the next 120 days," it said.

Although the State Department statement indicated a delay in a positive determination by Biden, the legislation requires him to revisit the issue in another 120 days.

British government said in a statement it "warmly welcomes the significant progress" to advance AUKUS.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

"UK and Australia are on track to meet the requirements of the NDAA and benefit from the exemptions," it said. "We are confident that by the next 120-day period we will have completed all the requirements for full implementation of the ITAR exemptions."

Australia's Department of Defence said in a statement it welcomed the "tangible steps" by the U.S. to streamline export control licensing requirements for AUKUS.

"The decision by the United States Department of Commerce to establish a license‑free dual‑use export environment amongst and between AUKUS partners is another significant step towards establishing a seamless environment for innovation, cooperation and collaboration," it said.

The Republican chair of the House Foreign Affairs Committee, Michael McCaul, called the Biden administration's failure to grant Australia and Britain ITAR exemptions by the initial deadline a "negative certification" and "very unfortunate."

"While I was pleased to see the Commerce Department quickly release an interim rule that will scale back export controls, the State Department continues to delay the necessary decision to deter and counter the threat posed by the Chinese Communist Party in the Indo-Pacific and beyond," he said in a statement.

The White House did not respond to requests for comment about Biden's decision.

On Thursday, the Commerce Department said it was scaling back its export-control requirements for Australia and Britain to foster cooperation under AUKUS.

However, the department only handles licensing of some defense-related items, not the broader range of items covered by the ITAR regime, which is governed by the State Department's Bureau of Political-Military Affairs.

3rd party Ad. Not an offer or recommendation by Investing.com. See disclosure here or remove ads .

Jeff Bialos, a former senior Defense Department official now a partner with the Eversheds Sutherland law firm, said the State Department has resisted blanket exemptions for Britain and Australia since they were first proposed by the Pentagon nearly 25 years ago, while he was in office.

However, he called the State Department statement "forward leaning" and said he now expected the three countries to put forward draft exemptions covering each other's export control rules.

"One of the criteria is that the other countries also have a system that will allow exports to the U.S. to be exempt. It's reciprocal," he said.

AUKUS' first pillar deals with the supply of nuclear-powered submarines to Australia, while Pillar II calls for more immediate cooperation in high-tech defense items such as quantum computing, undersea capabilities, hypersonics, artificial intelligence and cyber technology.

In announcing its move, the Commerce Department said both Australia and Britain "have robust export control systems and have taken additional steps in recent months to enhance technology protection."

Latest comments

Risk Disclosure: Trading in financial instruments and/or cryptocurrencies involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Prices of cryptocurrencies are extremely volatile and may be affected by external factors such as financial, regulatory or political events. Trading on margin increases the financial risks.
Before deciding to trade in financial instrument or cryptocurrencies you should be fully informed of the risks and costs associated with trading the financial markets, carefully consider your investment objectives, level of experience, and risk appetite, and seek professional advice where needed.
Fusion Media would like to remind you that the data contained in this website is not necessarily real-time nor accurate. The data and prices on the website are not necessarily provided by any market or exchange, but may be provided by market makers, and so prices may not be accurate and may differ from the actual price at any given market, meaning prices are indicative and not appropriate for trading purposes. Fusion Media and any provider of the data contained in this website will not accept liability for any loss or damage as a result of your trading, or your reliance on the information contained within this website.
It is prohibited to use, store, reproduce, display, modify, transmit or distribute the data contained in this website without the explicit prior written permission of Fusion Media and/or the data provider. All intellectual property rights are reserved by the providers and/or the exchange providing the data contained in this website.
Fusion Media may be compensated by the advertisers that appear on the website, based on your interaction with the advertisements or advertisers.
© 2007-2024 - Fusion Media Limited. All Rights Reserved.